May 27, 2007

On free speech

Filed under: Culture, Press Freedom, Blogs, Maghreb Issues, Law, Internet censorship — taamarbuuta @ 4:03 pm

I’m saddened and disappointed today. #1, by how many comments I’ve read, mostly in other blogs, in support of censorship; and #2, by the fact that it seems that Maroc Telecom/Itissalat Maghreb, owned by Vivendi Universal, has blocked YouTube on its own, and that it is, perhaps, not a directive of the Moroccan government (thanks Youssef for the info)

I should first clarify that most of the people I’ve found to be, seemingly, pro-censorship, support it in this case because the likely cause of the ban on certain websites was related to the rise of fundamentalist materials. That sounds fair.

But, the problem with censorship is that once it starts, it seems to pick up speed. First, they censor fundamentalist sites, then what? Soon, nothing is off-limits.

In Europe, hate speech has been criminalized. It is illegal in most countries to deny the Holocaust. Now, I will state that personally, I believe that the Holocaust happened, that it was one of history’s biggest tragedies, that the persecution of Jews, homosexuals, and other minorities occurred on the largest scale ever during that time. But what if I didn’t? Shouldn’t I have the right to express my opinion?

The U.S. Constitution allows for free speech in any form, excepting libel, slander, and speech which poses a direct threat to one’s person. The founders of the United States, tired of religious intolerance in Europe, created the First Amendment to protect against censorship.

Of course, I am the first to acknowledge that the American ideals have, in many ways, fallen apart - recent examples being the firing of Don Imus and possibly Rosie O’Donnell, the Senate bill introduced in 2005 that could have barred certain topics from university classroom discussions. My country is by no means, nowhere even close to perfect.

But I raise it in discussion because I believe in First Amendment ideals.

Morocco is not blocking YouTube simply because some fundamentalists may have posted videos there. If that were the case, they would not have censored Aboubakr Jamai, Ali Lmrabet, Sanaa Al-Aji and Driss Ksikes, none of whom support fundamentalism.

Although citizen media has not yet hit it big, look to Global Voices Online, MidEast Youth and all of the other sites that we have begun to look to for news - and look at the recent case of Bangladeshi blogger Tasneem Khalil if you don’t believe it’s possible for us to have influence.  Get your story picked up by RSF or HRW and you never know…

So props to The View From Fez, Youssef (here and here), Agora, Hchica, El Hafa, Larbi, Sami ben Gharbia at GVO, A Moroccan in Washington D.C. and anyone else who is making an effort to open a dialogue on this subject.

3 Responses to “On free speech”

  1. Mykal Cave Says:

    This may seem a little off topic but your post reminded me of a conversation I had with some people about a student here in Boulder Colorado who, shortly after the VT shooting during a class discussion, stated how he sympathized with the shooter at VT and how he could see wanting to kill numerous innocent people. The student was soon detained by police.

    I was surprised to find equal opinions in both support and against the student. Some argued that just because his comment was shocking and heartless, he didn’t do anything wrong and that his right to free speech was being taken away.

    But I couldn’t help but feel that, even though those may have been his true feelings, he chose the most inappropriate time and place to voice them. Granted it was a class room on a college campus having an open discussion, but just as much as that can be used to justify his actions, they can also be used against them too. It was borderline of the traditional example of going into a crowded theater and yelling fire.

    It would be just the same if someone was to board a plane post 9/11 (or even pre 9/11) and mumble how nice it would be if the plane went down.

    And as events like this have shown in the past, copycat crimes have the potential to soon follow the initial act of violence. So the security of students was on the rise all over the country. And I whole heartedly agree that the actions taken by the police were appropriate.

  2. Rachel Says:

    I agree. But I still don’t think bans, because of fundamentalism is a good enough excuse. And Don Imus wasn’t censored. He commented on the Jews way before blacks. His company fired him, which is totally legal and fair.

  3. MO Says:

    Well, I guess that Moroccan gov censored you tube, so they won’t run out of police and gendarms.Because they country looks ridicules on you tube, giving all the videos showing cops taking barberries right and left. sometimes they were acting like a toe station on a hwy. It didn’t matter what you drive or what you have in the vehicle as long as you driving thru a check point, you got to pay or you are in trouble.
    I don’t know for sure if those cops got prosecuted or not. But I thought we were in the time of (chafafia).
    but unfortunately we are back pedalling again.
    LET EVERYBODY KNOW ABOUT THE CENSOR PETITION .

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.